If that's not describing two names referring to the same concept, as opposed to two distinct (but closely related) concepts, I don't know what is.įurther, WP:IAR is supposed to apply if there is a good reason. The console was released in North America in 1989 under the name Genesis and commonly referred to as Sega Genesis".
![partition find and mount thorough scan did not find any paritions partition find and mount thorough scan did not find any paritions](https://www.tecmint.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Mount-Windows-Partition-in-Ubuntu.png)
The lead of the article itself clearly says so, "The Mega Drive (メガドライブ Mega Doraibu?) or Sega Mega Drive is a fourth-generation video game console. Just above Jinnai is still hanging on to the idea that the two are "not the same" (and therefore WP:AND applies). Monty 845 04:41, 13 October 2011 (UTC) Yeah, except the justification for this title is not based on WP:IAR. Changing the wording of the policy isn't going to undo an application of WP:IAR. While we generally try to follow policies and guidelines, they are not absolute, if there is a good reason to ignore them, and consensus to do so in a particular case, then we ignore them. ∞ 陣 内 Jinnai 04:28, 13 October 2011 (UTC) I don't think that particular title is misunderstanding of policy so much as it is a dispute resolution compromise. They are very similar, but not the same as Yoghurt and Yogurt. Born2cycle ( talk) 04:26, 13 October 2011 (UTC) They are not quite the same.
Partition find and mount thorough scan did not find any paritions how to#
Does anyone else?Īnyone agree or disagree this title is based on a misunderstanding of WP:AND? If agree, any suggestions on how to change the wording to be more clear about this? Thanks. I don't know of any other article that constructs its title from two names like this based on WP:AND. See also a current discussion about that particular title: Talk:Sega_Genesis_and_Mega_Drive#Requested_move. closely related or complementary concepts"., yet this wording was used to rationalize this title. This seems to me to obviously not be a case of "two. This wording has been used to justify using two names for the same subject in one title: Sega Genesis and Mega Drive ("Sega Genesis" and "Mega Drive" are two names that Sega used to refer to essentially the same product because it couldn't use "Mega Drive" in N. Where no reasonable overarching title is available, it is permissible to construct an article title using "and", as in Acronym and initialism Pioneer 6, 7, 8, and 9 Promotion and relegation and Balkline and straight rail. Where possible, use a title covering all cases: for example, Endianness covers the concepts "big-endian" and "little-endian". Sometimes two or more closely related or complementary concepts are most sensibly covered by a single article.
![partition find and mount thorough scan did not find any paritions partition find and mount thorough scan did not find any paritions](https://cdn.diskinternals.com/media/en/products/partition-recovery/par1-min.png)
![partition find and mount thorough scan did not find any paritions partition find and mount thorough scan did not find any paritions](https://images.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blt36c2e63521272fdc/bltd9a1d98a7142cf67/5dcb5a97d5a8797b8fa10e10/021109-0123-6.png)
![partition find and mount thorough scan did not find any paritions partition find and mount thorough scan did not find any paritions](https://blogchiasekienthuc.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/cuu-du-lieu-bi-ghost-nham-11.jpg)